Overruled


Judicial Temperment
February 9, 2009, 8:58 am
Filed under: Ian

One of the nice things about being a federal judge is that you get to keep trying cases, even in the midst of your own criminal trial:

Kent is accused of lying about sexual contact with an employee to federal judges who investigated a misconduct complaint against him. Because Kent is accused of lying, it’s possible prosecutors would try to question him about other possible accusations of lies — accusations that would not become part of the record if Kent doesn’t testify at all.

In addition to the obstruction charge, Kent, who continues to hear civil cases in his court, faces three counts of abusive sexual contact, one count of attempted aggravated sexual abuse and one count of aggravated sexual abuse.

The allegations against Judge Kent are really quite shocking.  Kent allegedly called a court employee into his office, where he “pushed up her shirt and bra, put his mouth on her breast and tried to force her head into his crotch.”  Assuming he’s convicted, I’m sure Congress will impeach and remove him from office in short order, but in the mean time I can’t imagine having to try a case before this guy.

Advertisements

1 Comment so far
Leave a comment

Yeah, especially if you’re a woman. Would any such cases be subject to appeal automatically after conviction just on the basis of a proven sexual harasser dealing with a female counselor?

Comment by Jeff




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: